[Masthead] Fair ~ 20°F  
Winter Weather Advisory
Sunday, Feb. 12, 2012

USD 234 budget stable for time being

Thursday, January 21, 2010
The USD 234 budget is stable, at least for the time being, district officials said this week.

Public schools all across the state have seen recent budget cuts as Gov. Mark Parkinson and the Kansas Legislature try to fix a $400 million deficit in the state budget. USD 234, which operates on about a $12 million general fund budget, is no exception. Estimated numbers show a loss of about $1.1 million in state funding from the 2008-09 school year through the 2010-11 school year due to no enrollment increases and a reduction in state aid to $4,012 per pupil.

Despite this fact, the district's finances are in order through the rest of the current school year, USD 234 Business Manager Alan Drake said.

"For the next couple of months, our expenses and payrolls are covered," Drake said. "We're OK."

Drake said that hopefully state lawmakers will pass a recent proposal by Parkinson to increase the state's sales tax to 6.3 percent from 5.3 percent for three years, which will be crucial in controlling future cuts in education funding and could possibly lead to more funding for Kansas public schools.

"The tax increase is critical to schools statewide," Drake said. "More cuts would be pretty devastating to us. If not, (tax increase) we hope they (legislators) carefully consider revenue from some source."

If the tax increase does not go through, state aid per student could drop again nearly $300, and schools are already possibly facing more budget cuts in the near future, Drake said.

"We're not over that hurdle yet," he said. "There could be future cuts that affect this year."

USD 234 has thus far avoided staff reductions due to the budget cuts, but some expenses have been trimmed or cut to save money. Some areas where the district has cut back include purchasing, equipment, funding for trips, transportation and energy. The district has also postponed textbook purchases this year, Drake said.

Another possible option to save on costs would be to implement a shorter school week, but that is a measure the district would put in place only after careful consideration by school officials on whether or not it would impact academics, Drake said.

"It's a possibility, but there would have to be a lot of board review and research and we'd have to see how it affects students," he said.

Total reductions in general state aid to public school districts is estimated to be $241 million compared to 2009 levels, according to the Kansas Department of Education.

Drake said USD 234 is not part of the Schools for Fair Funding coalition, a group that is trying to get the Kansas Supreme Court to reopen a 1999 lawsuit over state funding for education, and that the USD 234 Board of Education has not discussed the matter.

Reporter's note: A story concerning how recent education funding cuts have affected USD 235 in Uniontown will appear in a future edition of the Tribune.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on fstribune.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Mr. Drake is a fantastic superintendent!

-- Posted by brandonx1 on Thu, Jan 21, 2010, at 12:53 PM

Soooo......, cutting taxes is a bad thing? Every candidate says they want to cut taxes. You can read all day long about how people want less taxes. Now if a party wants to cut taxes, they get criticized. Putting more money into pockets so it can be spent in the economy is bad? Also, no one will believe that Republicans, or any other politician for that matter is not interested in supporting schools. Show me the "I don't support schools" candidate. While we are discussing schools, the sentence "Republicans are TO worried about cutting taxes to get reelected rather than properly funding public schools and protecting the future of this state" That is an improper use of a preposition, it should be "too", not "to"

-- Posted by save our history on Fri, Jan 22, 2010, at 11:05 AM

Also, it is better to try to fix the problem, than focus on that which started the problem. Looking or "focusing" on who started it is of no use. Look at Massachusetts, the democrats, including the White House tried to place blame on all their problems on Bush. People do not want to hear it. They want things fixed. Congratulations Senator Brown!

-- Posted by save our history on Fri, Jan 22, 2010, at 11:11 AM

Since you are calling out grammar of others, why did you capitalize "Republicans" but did not capitalize "democrats"?

-- Posted by blue st8r on Sat, Jan 23, 2010, at 9:36 AM

Ohh, Sexism. I guess only men can have opinions on such topics as politics and tax's.

-- Posted by save our history on Mon, Jan 25, 2010, at 1:20 AM

Among other solutions to be looked at are salary caps for employees, wage reductions in lieu of layoffs for employees, laying off certain administrators in our top heavy statewide school system.

-- Posted by like2b_onree on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, at 11:20 AM

It is spelled taxes, not tax's.

-- Posted by blue st8r on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, at 2:08 PM

I thought it was speled texas!

-- Posted by like2b_onree on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, at 3:48 PM

"es" you are 100% correct. But there is a subtle attempt of humor of ownership of those taxes. My main point is that some people have moved from Kansas due in part to taxes. Those same people when they move with their families move with the next generation. Which is the same next generation as commented above. The comment "Raise taxes and properly fund schools or watch our next generation leave, it is as simple as that." was made and my point was that when people move their families out of Kansas, they are taking that same next generation with them, instead of letting that next generation decide for themselves later if they want to leave. Lower taxes put more money into the economy, and promote spending. which in turn provides more tax revenue to the state to spend on things like schools. You cannot just increase taxes just because you want more money. There is a limit to it. Yes, look at they way Texas does it.

-- Posted by save our history on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, at 5:00 PM

Hey, the Texas thing was just being funny.

Don't bring Texas into this, don't mess with Texas, and yes, only men can have opinions on politics and tax's.

Just kidding!!!!!!!

Humor is not allowed, only baseless and childish insults, so go to the back of the class.

I actually agree with the premise of lower taxes=improved economys.

There seems to be a lot of people who believe that you can tax and spend your way into prosperity, even though there is no historical proof or precedent for that.

-- Posted by like2b_onree on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, at 8:26 PM

The Texas thing was a complement. Unless they have changed or I was told incorrectly (since I do not live in Texas), Texas has very very low income taxES, and no property tax. Kansas is still not competitive with states like Missouri, and we need to be.

-- Posted by save our history on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, at 11:33 AM

The assumption is that had the tax cutting not been done the increased revenue would have not been spent?

-- Posted by like2b_onree on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, at 10:41 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Related subjects