[Masthead] Partly Cloudy ~ 62°F  
High: 67°F ~ Low: 45°F
Friday, Mar. 24, 2017

When would YOU go for two?

Posted Wednesday, September 5, 2007, at 3:13 PM

Missouri head football coach Gary Pinkel said his two-point chart told him to go for two points after the Tigers took a 13-6 lead on Illinois Saturday afternoon.

I've heard of this chart. It's made so that a coach can just glance at it and know when to go for the two-point conversion instead of kicking the ball for one. The only thing about this was that I had not heard of a chart that's told a coach to go for two when he was already ahead by seven.

Later in the week, Pinkel said that his chart -- which he said he's been using for 35 years -- had an "error."

There's no perfect theory for going for two points. But there are some basic ideas;

* -- Don't Chase Points. If you miss the conversion -- whether it's for one or two -- early in the game, there's no reason to keep trying to "get it back," as long as you can still increase your lead. If you miss the kick after your first score and you're up 6-0, then just kick after the second one. Being up 13-0 keeps the pressure on the other team to decide to go for two later. Being up just 12-0 makes it easier for the other coach to just kick if his team comes back.

* -- What's the Advantage? My personal theory is to go for two points ONLY if you won't be worse off if you fail. For instance, if you're down one point, kick for the tie unless there are maybe less than two minutes left to go in the game. Tying the game means you only need a field goal to win. Missing the two-point conversion and remaining down by one point may cost you a chance to win in overtime. At the same time, why not go for two if you're down by five? If you kick the PAT, there's no difference between being behind five or behind four. You still need a touchdown to win. But if you make the two-pointer, you're down by three and you can tie with a field goal.

* -- Consider *When* You're Going for It. Going for two with 14 minutes to go may not be necessary. Going for two with six minutes to go may be the thing you need to do.

My personal chart would look like this….

ScoreGo forWhy
Behind 10 or moreKickPrevent point chasing. Only consider going for two if you're behind by 12, 16, 19, or 23 late. (because kicking to get it down to 11, 15, 18 or 22 doesn't change anything, but going for two and making it to get it down to 10, 14, 17 or 21 does).
Behind 9KickExample where "point chasing" can be bad. Don't think of going for two in this situation unless it's late in the game.
Behind 8EitherKick early to keep from "chasing points." Go for two later.
Behind 7KickNothing extra to be gained by successful 2-pt. conversion. Missing 2-pt. conversion may result in "point chasing" later. An instance in which going for two should NEVER be considered.
Behind 6KickNothing bad by kicking. Missing 2-pt. conversion may result in "point chasing" later. Only go for two if it's very late in game and you don't think you'll get the ball back.
Behind 5TwoSuccessful 2-pt. makes tie with FG possible. No difference in being behind 4 with good PAT or 5 on bad 2-pt. conversion.
Behind 4KickSuccessful kick creates chance to tie with FG. Missed 2-pt conversion means you need a TD to win.
Behind 3EitherSuccessful kick or made 2-pt. conversion creates chance to win with FG. Missed 2-pt. conversion still keeps tie with FG available.
Behind 2TwoSuccessful two ties. Failing doesn't hurt -- no difference between being behind two or one.
Behind 1KickEnsure tie score
TiedKickThe lead itself is more important than by how much. Don't think of going for two late. Force the other team's hand.
Ahead 1KickForce the other team to go for two to tie.
Ahead 2Two, but only late in the gameMissing still forces FG to win. Making forces TD to win.
Ahead 3KickPrevent possibility of tie with FG
Ahead 4-5KickBeing ahead one more point (5-6) doesn't make a difference
Ahead 6KickPut the decision to go for two in the other team's hands.
Ahead 7KickMissing will hurt if the other team comes back and scores a 2-pt. conversion themselves. Don't take that chance; force them to go for two by kicking to make it an 8-point lead.
Ahead 8Either, but kick late.Making a two makes it a 10-point game. But late in the game, take the easy point and force them to score twice to win.
Ahead 9Kick10 point-lead forces TD, conversion and FG to tie. Might even force them to go for two to win.
Ahead 10 or 11KickNo advantage gained being ahead by that one extra point.
Ahead 12Two.Risky but a successful two means they need two touchdowns.
Ahead 13 or moreKickAlways. No need to "chase points."

However, if you want the closest thing to a baseball strategy -- such as "Should he hit for the pitcher?" or "Would you play the infield in here?" -- that football has, going for two is it. Look at the scrutiny Pinkel's call underwent this week.

Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]

every single time

-- Posted by kennyfelt on Thu, Sep 6, 2007, at 4:45 PM

Dude, this ain't Madden. =0P

-- Posted by scottnuzum on Fri, Sep 7, 2007, at 4:22 PM

Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration:

From the Bleachers
Scott Nuzum
Recent posts
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]
Hot topics
What's the problem with hopping on the bandwagon? Nothing.
(0 ~ 2:39 PM, Oct 29)

Meet Belle
(4 ~ 6:16 PM, Oct 27)

Will you watch the Watchmen?
(3 ~ 12:12 PM, Mar 9)

A bit of a policy change
(1 ~ 5:36 PM, Jan 12)

In the press box at Arrowhead
(0 ~ 7:29 PM, Nov 2)